Parmenides’ concept of an underlying reality that creates relational reality seems to be weird. It is difficult to imagine that our experiences in daily live are not real in itself. Because if our experiences are some kind of an illusion why does this illusion seems to be logical and is governed by cause and effect and even universal constants and conservation laws. So if daily reality is an illusion, what about “supernatural” reality?
The image below shows a display of LED’s in a square arrangement (grid). The LED display shows text because all the LED’s can be individually put on and off. We can change the text with something like “TOM’s BAR” and even programming the display in such a way that the text moves from right to the left.
Nobody who watches the scroll of TOM’s BAR will conclude that these characters are independent beings in motion. Even if we watch a video on a high resolution LCD monitor we know that the video isn’t reality itself. It is a 2D reproduction of observable reality.
The square grid of the LED’s in the image above show some resemblance with the 2D face of the schematic image of Parmenides’ concept of reality (figure 1). In other words, if we build a 3D transparent LED display we can imitate relational reality if we program the lattice with moving shapes in every direction.
Now the most significant issue is not the imitation itself, it is the fact that motion is not what we experience in daily live. If I walk in the open air I don’t experience that the rest frame of the universe is propagating my body from unit to unit. I have the impression that I am “pushing” the air around me, like a ship is pushing the water aside with its stem. In other words, I am a unity and the air around me is not part of it. Actually the text books have told me that the air around is just a gas mixture, composed by a large number of fast free moving molecules.
figure 1
Our universe shows itself as a continuum and the consequence is evolution, although the concept of evolution originates from phenomenological reality. But from the mathematical point of view evolution is just a sequence of synchronised transformations of (and by) the units of the structure of our universe.
So if we roll back the evolution of our universe there was a period there was no matter. That means that the whole universe was filled with electromagnetic amplitudes “around” the scalars of a flat Higgs field. Now what does that means.
The deformable part of our universe – in QFT termed the universal electric field – is a topological field under invariant volume. Thus a unit can deform its shape but not increase or decrease its volume. The “power” to create this transformation is the internal spherical shape forming mechanism. In short: scalar mechanism. The origin of this mechanism is that every unit of the structure of the universe is actually a deformed scalar. In other words, its internal scalar mechanism is forced continuously to regain the shape of a sphere because there exists no stability (symmetry) inside the structure of the universe. We can imagine that all the “original” scalars (spheres) are pushed together so they are forced to deform till there is no empty space left between the spheres.[1]
figure 2
To regain the shape of a sphere a unit has to reconfigure its deformed area and these area are at the points of contact between the scalar of the unit and the scalars of the adjacent units. Figure 2 shows in a schematic way 3 units and each unit represents a different point of view. Unit I shows the inscribed sphere (scalar) and the deformed part of the unit around. Unit II shows the imaginary vectors within the scalar because of the “power” of the scalar mechanism and its limitation by the points of contact with the adjacent scalars. Unit III is a schematic cross section of the scalar mechanism of the unit.
The consequence of the points of contact between the scalars is that the fixed topological deformation of the unit – the Planck constant – is distributed over 1 or more points of contact. Thus the Planck constant – the electric field – creates corresponding vectors that are mediated by the scalars of the flat Higgs field.[2] These corresponding vectors are termed magnetic field in QFT. Both fields together are termed electromagnetic field.
Without matter in the universe there are only the continuous changing amplitudes of the universal electric field and its corresponding magnetic field. The amount of “power” of each unit is half the Planck constant (½ h). Because the whole topological deformation of a unit is caused by an input deformation from around and an output deformation to one or more units around. So this is the origin of the 2 universal conservation laws (energy and momentum).
If matter is created the lattice of the flat Higgs field is disrupted by decreased scalars. A decreased scalar cannot mediate the vectors of the magnetic field. Nevertheless the “power” of the universal electric field is conserved. So now we get the awkward situation that the direct correspondence between the amplitudes of the universal electric field and the generated magnitudes of the vectors of the magnetic field is partly changed into an indirect correspondence. What does that mean?
The velocity of the propagation of the quanta of energy between the units is the speed of light (c ≈ 300.000.000 ms-1). But the velocity of a vector is instantaneous, because a vector doesn’t propagate energy. A vector influence the direction of the propagation of energy by the universal electric field. The progression of a vector within the points of contact of the scalars of the Higgs field is only determined by the existence of opposite vectors and “co-moving” vectors.
If there is no matter in the universe every quantum of energy generates corresponding vectors and these corresponding vectors determine the distribution of the direction of the next fixed topological deformation (the Planck constant) of the involved units. In other words “there is a place for every egg in the egg carton” if there are no decreased scalars in the universe.
If there are decreased scalars the symmetry between the universal electric field and the corresponding magnetic field is broken. The asymmetry shows itself as a local deficit of corresponding vectors with the right magnitudes and somewhere else as a local surplus of vectors with the right magnitudes. But of course the asymmetry will restore the balance with the help of an indirect correspondence. That means that local configurations of energy – like human bodies – get a surplus of motion. But that is not how we interpret this surplus of motion. The surplus of motion is sometimes interpreted as “free will” and seems part of our consciousness.[3]
Local concentrations of energy are not limited to matter. Because of the synchronisation and conservation of all the quanta transfer in the universe[4] local concentrations of energy can be “tangible” too because of the continuous “push” by scalar mechanism of every unit.
More than 13,7 billion years ago there was a surplus of energy everywhere in vacuum space because there were no large scale structures of matter like full grown galaxies. But the surplus of energy – energy density – everywhere in vacuum space caused the creation of primordial black holes. Actually enormous “particles” that envelope decreased scalars of the Higgs field. See the schematic diagram in figure 3. The red horizontal line is the surplus of surface area (energy density) in the universe.
figure 3
The consequence was that at a certain moment the energy density of vacuum space was no longer sufficient to create new black holes. Thus the concentration of energy continued with creating particles. The James Webb Space Telescope observations show that in the early universe the mass of the black hole in the centre of a galaxy was dominant. But 13,7 billion years later the mass of the primordial black hole in the centre of a galaxy is 0,1% or less.
In other words, there are local concentrations of energy in vacuum space and these phenomena are not abandoned from local vectors with a surplus of higher magnitudes. So there exists “live” without matter (rest mass).
Conclusion
Supernatural reality is part of the dynamics of relational reality but it is not part of the theories in theoretical physics. Actually, academic physics seems to be a bit boring in relation to the intriguing world of supernatural reality. But supernatural is complicated too. So this will not be the only post about the subject.
References:
- (2020); “On the construction of the properties of discrete space”
https://zenodo.org/record/3909268 - (2024); “On the geometrical structure of quantised space”
https://zenodo.org/record/14556269 - 2024); “Consciousness in discrete space”
https:zenodo.org/record/14062564 - (2020); “Quanta transfer in quantised space”
https://zenodo.org/record/3756720
