The concept of determinism is not really popular. That is understandable because it seems to undermine our efforts to make things better in our live and in our society. No matter what meaning the individual person prefer to “making things better”. However, determinism is not that superficial, the concept is at the core of our universe.
The previous post was about the asymmetrical part of the correspondence between the universal electric field and the vectors of the magnetic field. The terms originate from classic physics but in quantum field theory these terms represent fields at the smallest scale size of reality, inclusive the universal scalar field (Higgs field).
It is obvious to state that the concept of determinism represents a basic property of relational reality. Actually determinism seems to be more foundational than consciousness. Because if the changes of our universe are deterministic the “principle” envelopes the whole evolution of the universe. So if we think about the manifestation of determinism, what does it represent?
It is for sure that determinism must be a concept that points to an aspect of the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of vectors. Because both conservation laws represent the conservation of momentum. Energy is the variable property of the universal electric field and the vectors of the magnetic field correspond with these variances. The universal electric field and its corresponding magnetic field are responsible for all the dynamics in the universe.[1]
One of the arguments to reject determinism is the existence of probability and its significance in quantum mechanics and quantum theory in general. Because in QM local energy densities are thought to be determined by the probability of the local amplitudes of the electromagnetic field. Unfortunately, probability theory has no proper mathematical foundation, only axioms (and rules). So rejecting determinism because of the significance of probability in quantum theory is not really convincing. Especially because the 2 universal conservation laws envelope the electromagnetic field. Therefore universal conservation in relation to the universe means the existence of non-locality and determinism.
If the outcome of every redistribution of energy and its corresponding vectors within the volume of the universe is zero there is no “room” for some kind of uncertainty. In the model of quantized space the redistribution of energy – actually the redistribution of the topological deformation of the shapes of the units of the structure of quantized space – is done by the scalar mechanism of every unit. It manifests itself by the continuous transformation of the shape of every unit of the structure.
The volume of every unit is invariant. So I can express the transformation of the shape of a unit with the help of the amount of transferred volume within the boundary of the unit during the constant of quantum time (1 tq). An amount of volume in relation to the joint surface area with the (12) adjacent units around. So I can express the transfer of volume within the boundary of the unit with the help of a simple equation:
Σ ΔV1 + ΔV2 + ΔV3 + ΔV4 + . . . . . . . + ΔV12 = 0
The equation is the sum (Σ) of the transformation in every part of the boundary of the unit. That means that some joint faces will expand their surface area – because of the accumulation of more volume – and other joint faces will shrink their surface area because the whole volume of the unit is invariant. The consequence is that we have to choose which type of volume transfer is positive or negative. In other words, the sum (Σ) unites all the volume transfer to and from the joint faces during 1 tq. In line with the invariance of the volume of the unit (ΔVinput = ΔVoutput).
figure 1
If we throw dices the numbers on each side of the dice don’t change, so these numbers are invariant. Like the transferred volume inside every unit of quantised space is invariant. The variance of a dice is limited to the numbers 1 through 6, but the variance of the transferred volume of a unit is perhaps even infinite. However the shape of every unit is reflected by the joint faces of the adjacent units. The consequence is that every unit shows the distribution of its internal volume transfer. Most of the time the shape of the unit reflects nearly the average shape of the units around. That means the amount of asymmetry of the shapes of the units (a symmetrical shape is impossible). But sometimes the shape of the unit is less asymmetrical or more asymmetrical. In other words the unit shows an asymmetrical shape distribution.
Conclusion
Our universe is totally deterministic, there cannot be any doubt. So every human thought, every human emotion and every human action is determined. And it doesn’t matter if our consciousness is attached to a material body or not.
Maybe some will become angry about this impingement of the universe on our “free will” and self-esteem in relation to others. But we cannot hack the system because we are not the system itself, we are manifestations of relational reality.
References:
- (2023); “Dynamics in discrete space”
https://zenodo.org/record/10443541 - (2021); “The mechanism behind probability”
https://zenodo.org/record/5515861
