The scientific point of view is the phenomenological point of view. That means that reality gets a meaning by the existence of the phenomena and their mutual interactions. The phenomenological point of view is about all the manifestations of energy in the universe.
The advantage of this point of view is that the dynamics of the phenomena can be described with the help of a metric. So space has a metric – the minimal length scale (ℓc) – and therefore quantum time has a metric too (ℓc/ c). And last but not least, we can handle the related abstractions.
But if we try to handle the abstractions of the part of reality that seems to exists without a metric that rules “space” and “time”, we actually feel helpless. A bit comparable with ideas about a tangible existence of a 5th, 6th, 7th, etc. dimension. Because we simply cannot imagine a picture of these dimensions.
This doesn’t mean that we are not aware of strange effects that are related with this part of reality. For example, experiments like quantum tunnelling. It is about electromagnetic waves or particles – e.g. a proton – that pass a barrier that theoretically cannot be passed. Measurements show that the duration of the pass through the barrier seems to be nearly instantaneous. At least the pass through the barrier exceeds the speed of light (> c).
So we can describe the experiment as a sequence of 3 related processes:
- the dematerialisation of the proton at one side of the barrier;
- the non-material pass through the barrier;
- the materialisation of the proton at the other side of the barrier.
It is process 2 that defies the metric (although not every theorist is convinced of the measured > c). Anyway, if we are not aware of process 1, we interpret process 3 as a sudden materialisation “from nothing” at one side of the barrier. And if we are not aware of process 2 and 3, we interpret process 1 as a magic vanishing just in front of the barrier. In other words, with the help of the used point of view we determine our interpretation of physical reality.
In physics we are focussed on energy changes – like the vanishing and reappearing proton – but that is only one part (half) of relational reality because every quantum of energy has corresponding vectors. That means that in the model of quantised space[1] the deformed shape of every unit of the structure of the universe generates corresponding vectors. This needs some more explanation.
The total deformation of the structure of the universe during the constant of quantum time (tq) is the total sum of the deformation of every single unit of the structure (2 x ½ h). Because “empty”space doesn’t exist. The consequence is that all the synchronised energy changes in the universe during 1tq are conserved.[2] But energy was also continuously redistributed before this 1 tq. That means that during this 1 tq there exists already a certain energy configuration everywhere that is the result of all the changes during the evolution of the universe (n x 1 tq). The consequence is that the vectors not only represent the change of ½ h during 1 tq. Each vector represents also the total amount of topological deformation of the unit at the point of contact with the scalar of the adjacent unit.[1] In other words, the super position of one vector on another vector with a higher magnitude.
This seems to be an easy concept because it is ruled by the addition and subtraction of vector magnitudes. Unfortunately within each unit of quantised space there is a distribution of topological deformation over all the joint faces of the unit. That means that we cannot know the actual magnitudes of all the vectors within the scalar of one unit. We can try to calculate the topological changes of a number of units and assign these changes to corresponding magnitudes. But to verify the simulation with real data we have to simulate the synchronisation of the topological deformation of these units and the instantaneous pass on of the corresponding vectors. And last but not least, the phenomenon we try to simulate isn’t the structure of quantised space itself, the phenomenon represents the mutual dynamical relations between the units. The structure of quantised space is the rest frame, the phenomenon – e.g. a proton – is not.
figure 1
The minimal length scale (ℓc) is about 0,5 x 10-15 m and the constant of quantum time (tq) has a duration of about 5,99 x 10-23 second. But the latter represents the quantisation of change because of the synchronisation of the topological deformation of all the units of discrete space. A synchronisation that is the effect of the identical and invariant volume of every unit of discrete space (simple geometry).
The topological deformation of a unit of quantised space during the period of 1 constant of quantum time (tq) envelopes theoretically “infinite” variance. So we cannot simulate a phenomenon – like a proton – in an 1 to 1 correspondence because the volume (number of involved units) that is directly related to the creation of a proton from vacuum space is huge. So in my opinion it is easier to “understand” what is going on than focusing on the duplication of the process with the help of a computer simulation. Unfortunately, modern physics is not about what reality is like. It is about the outcome of experiments in relation to a general mathematical formalism.
During a couple of months – from March 2025 – the planets in our solar system showed an “unique” evolving configuration of mutual relations. Astrologers study the influences of the Sun and the planets on the personal experience of the human “soul” in comparison with the galactic plane (the 12 astrological signs). As far as I know astrology is not part of the modern “Western” sciences. However, in general astrology is in line with the scientific method. In the past it was ridiculed because it was hilarious to think that far away celestial bodies can influence the human “soul”.
But the 2022 Noble prize physics was awarded to physicists who proved experimentally that our universe is non-local. In line with the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher and mathematician Parmenides of Elea about the oneness of the underlying reality that creates relational reality. In other words, everything in the universe influences everything at exactly the same moment. It is the consequence of the existence of the universal synchronisation of all the quanta transfer in the universe and the instantaneous interaction by the corresponding vectors. Gravity is a vector field – the vectorisation of the flat Higgs field under influence of decreased scalars – so the mutual influences between celestial bodies are influencing our consciousness. It is directly related to the existence of displaced vectors under influence of the creation of matter (see Displaced vectors; figure 1).
figure 2
The origin of the probability distribution is the continuous change of the units of the structure of quantized space.[1] That is why we cannot ignore that the probability distribution is also part of the human “soul”. Because it “rules” the distribution of human qualities (see Dual experiences). In other words it must influencing and creating our personal experiences in daily live too. That means that a lot of possibilities can be expressed with general descriptions of human experiences to describe the personal situation of a person. Qualities like happiness; sadness; wealth; poverty; optimism; pessimism; standstill; progress; decision; indecisive; etc. (see figure 2 and Dual experiences).
That is what esoteric tarot card readers practise when they “read” someone’s personal situation from the picked cards in relation to the astronomical sign and the date of birth of the person. Although there is also some kind of “subconsciousness” aspect of the reader itself involved in the translation of the general meaning of the card(s) into human experiences (“spirit told me”). In practise there are slightly different interpretations of the meaning of each card of the deck and even “alternative” meanings. I don’t want cherry picking so watch YouTube videos about astrological readings and tarot card readings. Mostly the astrological sign is announced and the date of the reading is known (upload video). So it is possible to compare astrological and tarot readings in relation to the astrological sign, etc. So it is possible to recognise that these readings are not random “crap”. Anyway, a lot of people make money with YouTube videos so don’t take every video for granted.
Conclusion
Our point of view – inclusive the general consensus about what is real and what is not real – determines how we interpret relational reality. But it is hard to ignore that the concepts of classic physics are still alive (phenomenological reality). The idea that our universe is non-local is not widespread and the concept of free will still dominates the “ethics” in human society. The majority of scientists is still convinced that consciousness is created by the “hardware” of the human brain – in conflict with the video of Annika and Tristan – so it is not difficult to imagine that scientific stagnation is on the rise.
References:
- (2024); “On the geometrical structure of quantised space”
https://zenodo.org/records/14556269 - (2024); “The box without walls”
https://zenodo.org/records/14540104
